Unclear Roles Destroy Productivity and Profit

Let's make this practical.

If you're a business that employs administrative staff, chances are you hire an admin officer to “support operations.” The common expectation is that they're hired to do everything they're told. No clear daily outputs. No definition of what good performance looks like. The result of such a hire is that they stay or appear busy, but nothing really gets done. There's always a crisis, and they're always waiting to be told what to do, while they doomscroll on their phone during work hours. You, as the business owner, still find yourself chasing invoices, resolving customer complaints, and trying to see where you're going to get the money to pay your staff, whom you seem to be working for.

If you employ a customer service representative, chances are their job description matches that of an administrative officer and vice versa. The reality is that, while both roles appear similar, some nuances make them completely different. The first thing you should have at the back of your mind before hiring any of these roles in future is that one is external-facing and the other is internal-facing. The customer service staff handles customer enquiries, complaints, follow-ups and protects your revenue and brand experience. The administrative staff is focused on internal organisation, managing records, documentation, schedules and day-to-day coordination that keeps the business running smoothly. While both are important, they serve different purposes. Confusing or merging the two often leads to poor service, internal errors and constant founder intervention.

The Hidden Costs of a Bad Hire Rarely Calculated

Before hiring someone new, most founders only consider the gross salary of the new hire. It's the 'smallest' or obvious cost. It's what is actively reflected on the company's bank statement. But there are some things you need to consider. Silent things that actually drain your business.

Have you considered the lost time spent correcting work? The energy you're diverting away from the business's growth? What about customer dissatisfaction and eventual loss of said customers when they choose to take their business elsewhere? There's also staff morale damage. Which is so often overlooked because some founders expect that salary alone should keep their staff engaged and committed to the business. The truth is, salary is not enough. Especially when buying power has been diminished by economic and social factors. Delayed execution and missed opportunities are also hidden costs of a bad hire. And if you have to let go of a bad hire, or they resign, the cost to rehire and the time to onboarding resets the clock.

The Reframe That Gives You Back Control

Instead of taking the faster hiring route that often leads to a bad hire, consider this approach instead. Hiring for “outcomes” instead of hiring for “help”. This distinction changes everything.

Hiring for help sounds like this: “I just need someone to assist me.” “There are too many things on my plate right now.” “I don't have the time.” “I need someone who can start immediately and hit the ground running.”

Hiring for outcomes sounds like this: “I need this role to reduce 'X' problem and deliver 'Y' result within 'Z' time.”

Help creates dependency. It means they cannot move without your say-so. They need to be told what to do. And, they can't take responsibility. Outcomes, on the other hand, create accountability. Makes room for ownership and frees up your time. Most bad hires happen because the role was designed to absorb stress, not deliver results.

One counterintuitive insight most founders resist is: hiring faster does not save money. Hiring clearer does. It may seem like clarity slows things down. But, in reality, clarity speeds everything up. Clear roles attract better candidates. Clear outcomes shorten interviews. Clear expectations reduce supervision. So, if you want speed, get clear first.

Connect with us.